Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jordan Thompson vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Thompson vs Zandschulp analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Jordan Thompson vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Thompson 0 - 1 Zandschulp
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Thompson has won 54.24% of points on their second serve, while Zandschulp has won 46.27%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Thompson, in recent form, has won 46.98% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 49.29%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.55% and 31.02% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Thompson has saved 70.23% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 58.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Thompson has won 53.45% of matches played (W/L 31/ 27), with Zandschulp winning 48.15% (W/L 26/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Thompson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 38/ 20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 86/ 64). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 10/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Thompson has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 64.1% of matches (W/L 25/ 14), where as Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 40.91% of matches (W/L 9/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Thompson winning 0 times and Zandschulp being victorious 0 times. They have played 1 sets in total, with Thompson winning 0 and Zandschulp winning 1. The last match between Thompson and Zandschulp was at the U.S. Open - New York, 29-08-2023, First, Hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-3 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:53:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Thompson and Zandschulp have played a deciding set 0 times, with Thompson winning 0 times and Zandschulp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Thompson winning 0, and Zandschulp 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Thompson has played against opponents with an average rank of 148.24 while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 176.8.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Thompson has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Thompson has converted 34.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 38.74% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
39
Rank
32
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
96
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
60% (447-299)
Career Total W/L
63% (332-199)
56% (19-15)
YTD W/L
40% (12-18)
$2,991,515
Career Prize Money
$2,993,825
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Jordan Thompson vs Botic Van De Zandschulp For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Thompson VS Zandschulp
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
Thompson VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Jordan Thompson | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 1 |
| Games Won | 3 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs Total | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:53:0 | 0:53:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 47% (15/32) | 51% (18/35) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (11/15) | 72% (13/18) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 29% (5/17) | 59% (10/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (12/35) | 50% (16/32) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Thompson VS Zandschulp H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 ret. |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Jordan Thompson
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve %
47%
(
15 of
32)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
12 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
39
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jordan Thompson | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (19/15) | 40% (12/18) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (44/40) | 41% (28/41) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (406/412) | 47% (314/360) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 36% (4/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 47% (7/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.48 | 0.4 |
| Aces Total | 193 | 130 |
| DFs per game | 0.1 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 41 | 98 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:6:50 | 1:47:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 140.41 | 181.13 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1574/2612) | 62% (1326/2130) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (1112/1574) | 68% (906/1326) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (563/1038) | 46% (372/804) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (76/220) | 39% (74/191) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (941/2618) | 38% (817/2138) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/4) | 50% (5/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (18/9) | 38% (5/8) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (17/30) | 44% (12/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 79% (11/14) | 50% (7/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 58% (7/12) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (18/14) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (18/4) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 31% (16/5) | 6% (18/1) |
Jordan Thompson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Jordan Thompson
69%
(
60 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Taylor Fritz
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Andy Murray
50%
(
5 of
10)
1st Serve %
56%
(
9 of
16)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
100%
(
5 of
5)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
18
Total Points Won
8
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Holger Rune
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
8
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
45 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
45 of
58)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
18 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Milos Raonic
Player
Jordan Thompson
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
14
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
8 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Jordan Thompson
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Jordan Thompson
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Jordan Thompson
71%
(
79 of
112)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
113)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
44 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
113)
113
Total Points Won
112
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Jordan Thompson
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
56%
(
60 of
107)
1st Serve %
82%
(
86 of
105)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
86)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
41%
(
44 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
8
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
97
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
47%
(
36 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Quentin Halys
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
66%
(
87 of
132)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
44 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
121)
129
Total Points Won
124
|
7-5 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Zachary Svajda
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
29 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Thompson Vs Zandschulp Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Thompson are available here and Zandschulp photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jordan Thompson
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Botic Van De Zandschulp
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
